Willa's Flic Pic: The Darjeeling Express * * * ½
The Darjeeling Express
- Wes Anderson
- Drama/Comedy, 2007
- R
- Trailer
* * * ½
Francis: You don't love me!
Peter: Yes I do!
Jack: I love you too, but I'm gonna mace you in the face!
I’ve seen all of Wes Anderson's films except for Bottle Rocket, which I just put on my Netflix list. Anderson is the producer, writer, and director of all his films, including the more well known Rushmore.
The common theme throughout Anderson’s films is outrageous characters and the function of families full of outrageous characters. Although most may watch his films and think they don’t identify with his characters, looking from the outside in, more of us resemble this behavior than we may perceive or want to admit.
After his success with Bottle Rocket and Rushmore, I wonder if the reviewers grew tired of his theme. There are not nearly as many rave reviews for The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou and The Darjeeling Express, both of which I really enjoyed.
If you are a casual moviegoer, you may simply observe strange characters, sometimes in unusual settings, doing completely nonsensical things. "What are they doing?" and "why did he say that?" will run through your head often. But, as in real life, what we say and what we try hardest not to say is what holds an infinite number of subtleties about our relationships and ourselves.
For me, Anderson’s films are a great experiment in the complexities of communication in the family dynamic. A father may say, "Change the channel to whatever you want to watch," but the meaning may be, "I'm making a gesture of being polite but don't you dare change the channel."These are the subtleties that Anderson plays with in very absurd and comic ways with only a sprinkling of heart wrenching sadness, just enough to make you realize he's just made a point but not so strongly that you leave the movie sad and depressed.
The Darjeeling Express is a complicated tale of three brothers reuniting after a year. What happened a year ago and since is revealed casually throughout the story. When you are finally equipped with a modicum of this information, you must think hard to look back over the outrageous behaviors throughout the film and recognize how it explains that odd behavior, very much like life itself. We forget all of the revealing moments and thus fail to interpret "Change the channel" in the way it was intended.
Anderson also has a beautiful style with the camera. Color and perspective are extremely important to his compositions. This is really played out in The Darjeeling Express, which is set in the rich and colorful India. Anderson does such a great job with the filming that you can almost smell and feel each scene; it's very immersing.Anderson also incorporates what I call living dioramas – a very brief close-up of a small scene with one character and only small movements that tell a one-sentence story. This is a very daring technique given the stress of efficiently using the two-hour length of film and your audience's brief attention span.
I haven't mentioned anything about the cast but it is stellar. Like Joss Whedon and M. Night Shyamalan, Anderson has cast some of the same actors throughout all of this projects: Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody, Bill Murray, and Jason Schwartzman. They all seem to understand the importance of Anderson's efficient use of dialogue and movement.
For a study of dialogue and the power communicated through actions, use Anderson's films as some of your subject matter.
Labels: Movie Reviews
posted by rhon at
2:11 PM
|
1 comments
Slither
You know I'm a super light-weight when it comes to horror films. My T5 for this time if year is best called 
The only experience I had with Gunn's work prior to this was 
I don't think bad special effects would have ruined this film. It might have turned into a cult classic but, as it is, the effects were noticeably impressive. MyGeek pointed out that they used such massive amounts of the material to create the Grant monster that the national supply was depleted. They had to shut the shoot down for a month so the manufacturer could produce more.
The Lookout
Of the five reviews I read about this movie, all but one gave it top praises. Not only that, they could say nothing bad about it. I tend to side with the one review that had some negative things to say but this still is a film worth seeing.
Although the four-out-of-five reviews credited everything to the story written by 
With the caliber of performances Frank was getting out of his actors, I had the constant feeling that I wasn't getting enough story. Don't get me wrong. I don't like everything spelled out. I like the reality of actions speaking louder than words. But there was the feeling of things missing from Pratt's story. One female character completely disappears from the story in a confusing scene. There are undertones of a rivalry between Pratt and a player from a rival school team that was too vague. It was a tease. I liked the idea but the story never pursued it.
In taking on this project, the film makers were faced with the difficult job of telling a single story at a climatic moment in time of an intensely complex history. The real story here is how the dedicated diplomat and professional Rusesabagina, manager of the four-star Hôtel des Mille Collines in Kigali and Hutu man married to a Tutsi, is affected by the chaos that ensues in the 90 some-odd days of the genocide. Rusesabagina has interaction with practically every faction involved in this conflict but the viewer gets confused. Who are they and what are their intentions. It's understandable. There's the Hutu army, Interahmwe, UN, French Army, United States, Hutu businessmen, RPF, Red Cross, Sabena... you get the picture.
More than half-way through the film I was beginning to wonder if there was going to be a climax to the story or if it was simply a telling of a sequence of events, more like a documentary. Eventually there was a climax and I felt like I was in a story again. This pace made the film feel a little choppy.
Don Cheadle is brilliant. I'm impressed with him in everything I've seen (
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Pan's Labyrinth
When we popped the DVD in for this film, we selected to see the director's introduction. With an ironic laugh, del Toro said that he hoped we enjoyed the movie that almost killed him in the making. We knew were about the see an intense film made by an intense, dedicated guy.
For a film that is seen as a "fairy tale", it is very violent and many wonder why. In an 
I struggled with giving this film my highest rating but I didn't know why. So I ask my qualifying question: What's wrong with the film? Acting, directing, filming, screenplay, costume, music, editing, f/x - anything? I came up with nothing. The only thing that was giving me pause was the fact that it is a tough movie to watch, in all aspects. Innocence faces injustice, life value is determined by net gain, the weak have to face evil alone because those who should be there are either blind or cowardly.
Next
That 25-year-old Jessica Biel is 43-year-old Cage's leading lady is disturbing. Biel is the current hot item in Hollywood but we all know it's not for her acting abilities. The role simply called for a muse, a beautiful woman to inspire an uninspired man. There are a lot of hot 40-somethings out there who could have done this.
Disturbia
It's unmistakable that this is a remake of the famous Hitchcock film, 
The make or break element in remaking this classic was in casting the lead, originally played by 
We first saw LeBeouf in 
David Morse, another favorite of mine, plays the bad guy in this movie. Morse plays a lot of supporting roles but is a powerful actor and should play lead. I loved his character in 
The Prestige
The Prestige is about two enormous, competing egos. Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) and Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) are magicians who started out studying and working together. But when Angier's wife dies on stage during a trick, he blames Borden and they part ways very bitter. From here it's a tit-for-tat as each tries to ruin the other's career in one-upmanship and dangerous sabotage.
When I watched Thr3e the second time through, I was hit by all the implausibilities. "That's ridiculous" and "that wouldn't happen" crossed my mind several times. But with The Prestige, it was more "oh, wow, they got me on that one" and "oh, I see now." It was very well crafted. While showing magic, it was performing magic on the viewer at the same time and doing it well. I never completely figured it out and neither did My Geek, which is saying something.
The story is pretty intriguing but I have to say that I didn't like either magician at all. In that sense, I was much more empathetic toward Thr3e's Kevin Parsons. Borden and Angier take tremendous risks but they involve other's without full disclosure. Had Borden and Angier's unwitting friends and family known, they would have at least had a choice. Instead, they are casualties in a mere battle of egos. But isn't that always the case with brilliant minds willing to risk anything to do the impossible? Look at the tragic lives of our greatest poets, artists and scientists.
I've loved Christian Bale in everything I've seen him in (Equilibrium, The Machinist, Batman Begins). He's a smart, dedicated actor and it's art to watch his strength on screen. Angier goes a long way in seperating Jackman from Wolverine, which he needs. (I haven't seen The Fountain but I'm anxious to.) And could we have more David Bowie, please! He should do like Christopher Walken and make a cameo in every film. He's always interesting and so diverse - a master craftsman.
As My Geek said, "I am so over Scarlett Johansson." Anyone could have played Olivia and probably given it more than a pouty face. But then, again, we are still recovering from The Black Dahlia. Rebeccah Hall did a much more interesting job as Sarah, the only utterly sympathetic adult character in the entire film.
Thr3e
While at the library last year browsing the New Releases shelf, I ran across a book with Frank Peretti's name on it called 
The issue I have with this film is believability. And it becomes even more unbelievable when you watch it a second time. A film can play slight of hand along the way to advance the story but I shouldn't be able to see the ace up your sleeve while you're doing it. Without giving anything away, there is a character whose actions and whereabouts are just impossible. Don't get me wrong. The premise is intriguing but the context in which the character is set is way too tight. The story simply can't hold up to it.
The character is puzzling but not blatant like some other far-fetched things in the film - like how a seminary student winds up living in a top floor loft apartment and a garden shed having a sub basement ten times its size.
I was pleased to see Marc Blucas in the lead. The last I saw of him was his appearances in seasons 4, 5, and 6 of 
Stranger Than Fiction
Harold Crick is an IRS agent who starts hearing a voice narrating his life. He's the only one that can hear it. He pursues typical mental health means to explain the phenomenon but makes no progress in getting rid of the voice, much less in being understood as anything but a psychopath. Then he hears the narrator predict his "imminent death" and Harold has only one option left - he enlists the aid of a literature professor.
I love it when someone finds a unique way to tell a familiar story. In this case, Zach Helm (writer) deals with the question: What would you do if you knew when, where and how you were going to die? It seems easy. Don't get out of bed that day! But Helm turns this on its ear. Harold makes his choice and, in that moment, the film is asking you - What would you do?
But every character in the film has a choice to make - to take a risk or to change their priorities - either for the betterment of themselves, those around them or the world. We're all connected and our choices do not function in a vacuum. Will you try something new, seize the day, pursue love, risk getting hurt, give hard advice or face a fear?
I have a friend who has an aversion to Will Ferrell movies. Understood. But like Jim Carrey (
Emma Thompson and Dustin Hoffman also have great characters and do a brilliant job as the author and literature professor. The characters are so engaging, I want more stories about them when the film is over. Queen Latifah plays a writer's assistant. My Geek thought the character was unnecessary but I thought she served a great purpose.
The Notebook
Little Miss Sunshine
Olive's family is dysfunctional like all families. Name an issue and they are dealing with it: teenage rebellion, senior rebellion, divorce, suicide, drug abuse, bankruptcy, homosexuality, pornography. In the middle of all this, the family decides to support Olive by taking a sudden road trip from Albuquerque to California because the winner of Little Miss Sunshine can't defend her title. And we all know how well families get along on a long road trip in a broken down car!
I don't know if I can put my finger on exactly why I liked this movie so much. The more I think about it, the more thrilled I am about it. It has a fantastic cast. They expertly handle each delicate moment between darkness and levity. We recently watched 
As for the story, each member of the family struggles alone to achieve a perceived ideal. One by one their dreams are shattered. I guess it's just heart-warming to watch as they each realize they can have new dreams and a better chance at accomplishing them together.
